Skip to content

Lifestyle5 min read

DOJ Investigates Juniata County Bus Driver Fired Over “English-Only” Sign

A Juniata County bus driver was fired over an "English-only" sign. The Department of Justice is investigating her termination, sparking debate on civil rights and "DEI wokeness." Read more.

Share

Topics

DOJ Opens Probe After Juniata County Bus Driver Fired Over “English-only” Sign

Diane Crawford, a 66-year-old school bus driver in Juniata County, Pennsylvania, was fired after posting an “English-only” sign on her bus — a move that prompted a U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division investigation and intense local debate.

Key takeaways

  • Diane Crawford, 66, a longtime driver and Rohrer Bus subcontractor, was terminated after posting a sign restricting Spanish on her bus.
  • The U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division opened an inquiry after Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon called the case “deeply concerning.”
  • The district and employer say they followed discipline procedures; Crawford says she was not given a fair chance to explain.
  • The episode raised questions about bullying, free speech, workplace rules and how districts train and support drivers.

Key information

Who: Diane Crawford, 66, a school bus driver and Rohrer Bus subcontractor who worked more than 35 years in student transportation, including 12 years with Rohrer Bus. Sources include ABC News4 and Local21.

What: She posted a sign reading, “Out of respect to English-only students, there will be no speaking Spanish on this bus.” She was later terminated. Reporting on the incident is available from ABC News4 and Local12.

Why: Crawford says the sign targeted a bilingual student she says had been “riling up” peers by speaking Spanish and allegedly directing insults; she says she intended to curb bullying and did not have an opportunity to fully explain before her contract ended. See Local21 and Local12.

Incident details: Crawford’s account

Crawford says she placed the sign in a bus window after repeated problems with a bilingual student who, she alleges, used Spanish to incite or insult other students and called her names such as “Gordo.” She told local outlets the note was intended as a warning and a way to restore order on a bus she had driven for decades. Crawford also said she had previously asked supervisors for help and felt unsupported before the sign episode. After backlash, she said she regretted the wording and suggested a less inflammatory alternative: “No bullying in any language.” (Sources: Local21, Local12.)

Firing process and school district response

Juniata County School District and Rohrer Bus said they followed discipline procedures. Officials told reporters they first suspended Crawford pending review, obtained a written admission that she posted the sign, and concluded the action violated standards for student transportation providers. District leaders emphasized prioritizing student well-being and maintaining a safe, inclusive environment. They noted a training session provided with the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission on April 17, 2025, covering equity and student-transportation protocols that informed their response. (Sources: ABC News4, Local21.)

Dispute over how events unfolded

The accounts diverge on procedure. Crawford says she received an overnight call from a supervisor ending her contract and that she had no suspension or formal hearing before being told she was fired. The district and Rohrer Bus maintain they suspended her pending review and acted after evaluating the situation. The core dispute centers on whether she was given an opportunity to explain intent before termination and whether the district’s process was procedurally sound. (Sources: ABC News4, Local21, Local12.)

Aftermath for Crawford

Crawford described the firing as a “nightmare.” She says she is now on Medicare, Medicaid and SNAP benefits and takes antidepressants. Crawford said she paid $30,000 in 2024 to acquire her bus and route and is seeking compensation and an admission of error. A petition to have her rehired collected more than 1,000 signatures, reflecting local support; she expressed gratitude for community backing and the national attention that followed. (Sources: ABC News4, Local21, Local12.)

DOJ investigation and national response

On Dec. 22, 2025, U.S. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon reposted media coverage of the firing on X and directed the Civil Rights Division to investigate, calling the case “deeply concerning” and linking it to what she described as “DEI wokeness.” Her post drew hundreds of comments, many supporting Crawford and criticizing the probe. Reporters noted no further public updates about the federal inquiry at the time of reporting. (Source: ABC News4.)

Community and media reaction

Local outlets amplified both Crawford’s account and the district’s statements. Crawford appeared in interviews with CBS 21 and WHP, and a video of her telling her side was posted on YouTube. Coverage highlighted a clash over intent versus perception — whether the sign was a safety measure against bullying or a racially insensitive restriction on the Spanish language. The story attracted national attention for touching on free-speech debates, school safety and federal civil-rights enforcement. (Sources: ABC News4, Local21, YouTube.)

Implications for Utah

The Crawford case offers several takeaways for Utah districts and communities:

  • Policy and training: Utah districts may review language-use policies, anti-bullying protocols and driver reporting procedures to prevent ad-hoc actions that can spark controversy.
  • Free speech vs. employment rules: Conservative audiences in Utah may view this as part of broader debates over workplace discipline and speech; federal involvement will be watched closely.
  • Safety and student conduct: Rural and mountain-route drivers need clear tools and documentation to handle bullying so they do not feel compelled to post public notices.
  • Political and legal fallout: If the DOJ pursues action, districts statewide may tighten documentation and discipline procedures to defend personnel decisions.
  • Practical steps for families and drivers: Parents and drivers should know reporting channels, district communication protocols and how language differences are handled; districts might adapt training similar to the Pennsylvania session for local law and needs.

Reporting note and sources

This article is based on reporting from local and national outlets that covered the incident and the federal response, including ABC News4, Local21, Local12, and a video posted on YouTube.

Share

Topics

Jill Norcot

Jill Norcot is a senior national education reporter for Times Media Service, based in the Washington bureau. Norcot covers education nationwide, including schools, teachers, higher education, federal education policy and student issues, and how policy changes and classroom trends affect students, families and educators. Norcot holds a master's degree in international journalism and grew up in Bristol, England.

Write to Jill