Skip to content

Business4 min read

DEI Consultant Gilbert Dávila Resigns from Cracker Barrel Board

Gilbert Dávila, a DEI consultant and Cracker Barrel board member, resigned following ongoing controversy and a contentious proxy fight. Learn more about the factors leading to his departure.

Share

Topics

Cracker Barrel DEI consultant Gilbert Dávila resigns from board after heated proxy fight

Gilbert Dávila, a DEI consultant and independent director on Cracker Barrel’s board, resigned after failing to secure shareholder support amid a heated proxy fight led by activist investors and critical proxy-advisor recommendations that intensified scrutiny of DEI in corporate governance.

  • Director departure: Gilbert Dávila resigned after lacking shareholder backing for re-election; Fox Business.
  • Board tenure and role: Dávila joined in 2020 and chaired the Compensation Committee; he leads DMI Consulting; PR Newswire, Boston25.
  • Activist pressure and advisors: Sardar Biglari led the challenge; ISS and Glass Lewis recommended votes against Dávila, amplifying opposition (Fox Business).

Key information

  • Resignation details: Dávila left the board after failing to win re-election at the 2025 annual meeting; source: Fox Business.
  • Board history: Joined in 2020; chaired Compensation Committee; CEO of DMI Consulting (PR Newswire; Boston25).
  • Activist campaign: Sardar Biglari criticized performance and rebranding; sought board change and CEO removal (Fox Business).
  • Proxy advisors: ISS and Glass Lewis recommended voting against Dávila, influencing institutional votes (Fox Business).

Background: Dávila’s role and record

Gilbert Dávila joined the Cracker Barrel board in 2020. He brings a background in multicultural marketing, including senior roles at Disney and Sears, and now leads DMI Consulting, a firm focused on diverse customer segments. As chair of the Compensation Committee, Dávila influenced pay and governance discussions during a period of intense public feedback.

The path to resignation

Pressure mounted ahead of the 2025 annual meeting. Activist investor Sardar Biglari—owner of roughly 3% of shares—publicly criticized management, the controversial rebrand and what he described as missteps tied to DEI influence. Proxy advisory firms ISS and Glass Lewis recommended voting against Dávila, adding momentum to the dissent.

Preliminary meeting results showed support for most of the company’s slate, but Dávila did not secure sufficient votes. The board announced he stepped down after shareholders signaled opposition; board size now reduced from ten to nine directors (PR Newswire; Fox Business).

The broader firestorm: rebrand, backlash and DEI scrutiny

Earlier in the year, a rebrand and logo change drew national criticism for straying from Cracker Barrel’s traditional image. Critics and conservative commentators argued the rebrand—and perceived DEI influence—alienated core customers. Reports also noted an EEOC complaint related to DEI policies, which intensified scrutiny on directors with DEI backgrounds (HR Brew; AOL).

“The controversy highlighted tensions between modern branding efforts and the expectations of a traditional customer base,” analysts said.

Company and board response

Cracker Barrel pushed back against activist claims, calling Sardar Biglari’s campaign “costly and distracting.” After the vote the board thanked Dávila for five years of service and emphasized a continued focus on shareholder value, noting the re-election of CEO Julie Masino and nine other nominees as evidence of investor support (Fox Business; PR Newswire).

Why proxy advisors mattered

Proxy advisory firms like ISS and Glass Lewis can heavily influence institutional voting. In this case, both recommended against Dávila, likely swaying the margin of shareholder opposition that precipitated his exit (Fox Business).

Voice of investors and activists

Sardar Biglari and allies framed the campaign as a defense of shareholder value, citing falling shares, the rebrand backlash, and strategic missteps. Company leadership countered that most shareholders backed the board’s slate, demonstrating a split where cultural concerns—particularly around DEI—polarized votes even as management retained broader support (PR Newswire).

Implications for Utah

Economic impact: Utah’s restaurant and hospitality sector, including franchisees and suppliers, may feel effects if national strategy or supplier contracts change. Local operators should monitor corporate communications for potential shifts (PR Newswire).

Political consequences: The episode will resonate with Utah conservatives skeptical of corporate DEI programs and may inform local policy debates on business regulations and procurement rules (Fox Business).

Social and cultural effects: In communities valuing traditional hospitality, the rebrand controversy could shift customer loyalties and fuel local discourse about cultural continuity and brand identity (HR Brew; AOL).

Practical applications: Utah franchisees, employees and suppliers should prepare for potential adjustments in marketing, menu promotions, supplier contracts or compensation policies as leadership responds to investor pressure (Food Manufacturing).

Reporting sources and further reading

Note: This reporting is based on preliminary vote results and public statements from Cracker Barrel, activist investors and proxy advisory firms. Further filings and disclosures may provide additional detail about vote tallies and any subsequent board actions.

Share

Topics

Joel Patterson

Joel Patterson is a senior business and finance analyst for Times Media Service, based in the Washington bureau. Patterson covers markets, companies, personal finance and economic policy, along with transportation and its financial and economic impacts. Patterson holds a master's degree in finance and grew up in Newcastle upon Tyne, England.

Write to Joel